Idea] Turbofish replacement - language design - Rust Internals

This is not an Pre-RFC yet, I’ll write one when it collects some hype and initial bikesheddings for it. The idea here is a new syntax which does exactly what fn-call-after-turbofish does currently, but fancier. It basically looks like this. mem::size_of(:T); iter.collect(:Vec<_>); make_array(:u8, :64, 0); do_something(:T, :U, a, b); So function call arguments can be started with optional type arguments. Type arguments are started with :, and interpreted in type context. All type arguments mus

Enjoy the Vue Podcast on Spotify

Planet Mozilla

Generic function failing to satisfy any lifetime on argument - help - The Rust Programming Language Forum

Ideas for redesigning the Rust logo - community - The Rust Programming Language Forum

Announcing safety-dance: removing unnecessary unsafe code from popular crates : r/rust

Rust is the most loved language four years in a row : r/rust

The lower bar of a hypothetical Rust 2.0 : r/ProgrammingLanguages

Rust Anyhow ? Turbofish :: / HTTP Calls and Errors @ Rust Meetup Linz (Austria)

Planet Mozilla

Pain Points - A Gentle Introduction to Rust

Planet Mozilla

What does #[rustc_box] mean? - compiler - Rust Internals

Rust Anyhow ? Turbofish :: / HTTP Calls and Errors @ Rust Meetup Linz (Austria)

Rust Anyhow ? Turbofish :: / HTTP Calls and Errors @ Rust Meetup Linz (Austria)