The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether The Last of Us Part I is worth the $70 asking price, the question surrounding this remake is how much the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog treat this as a total do-over, changing the level design, gameplay mechanics and player upgrades? It has become obvious over the last few weeks, as Sony released a handful of preview videos, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the game directors told Engadget that the goal was to bring massively updated visuals and a host of quality-of-life improvements to a game that would otherwise stay true to its roots.

The Last Of Us Part 2 Isn't For Everyone, Director Warns - GameSpot

The Not So Hidden Israeli Politics of 'The Last of Us Part II

Characters of The Last of Us - Wikipedia

Everything We Know About The Last of Us HBO Series

The Last of Us' Video Game Director Will Direct HBO Series

The Last of Us' Season 2 News: Everything We Know So Far

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Last of Us review: True to the game, and just as hard-hitting

How Will 'The Last Of Us' End? The Original Game Ending & Possible

What does Ellie's tattoo in 'The Last of Us Part II' mean? - The

The Last of Us Part 2 writers have an outline for Part 3, but no

Development of The Last of Us - Wikipedia

Lies and Forgiveness, A Character Study of The Last of Us Part II

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so