Shin Handong Global Univ. and Moonzoo KAIST - ppt download

Por um escritor misterioso

Last updated 04 junho 2024

Shin Handong Global Univ. and Moonzoo KAIST - ppt download

Pros and Cons of Auto. Test Gen. at System-level Pros: No false alarms Cons: Low bug detection power due to large search space Execution tree Nowadays, automated test generation techniques are widely used in academia and industry at system-level and unit-level. First, let’s look at the pros and cons of system-level test generation. The pros of system-level test generation is that we do not need to worry about false alarm. We can give any inputs to a target program and the program should handle unexpected inputs. On the other hand, the cons of system-level test generation is low bug detection power due to large search space. Within a given limited time, it can explore only a few part of search space, so it can miss corner case bugs. Explored paths of a program Real bug
AFL-fast [Boehme et al., CCS 16] : Coverage-guided fuzzing. KATCH [Marinescu and Cadar, ESEC/FSE13] : Directed concolic testing for patch verification. Mix-CCBSE [Ma et al, SAS11] : Directed concolic testing combining backward call-chain exploration and forward shortest-distance guided concolic testing. Variants of FOCAL for RQ3. FOCAL without Craig interpolant-based summary refinement (FOCAL-I)